Sunday, October 14, 2012

Why is it so hard for the President and Vice President to tell the truth? Without a doubt there are supporters who believe everything that is proclaimed from the White House. In their eyes, the administration can do no wrong. However I challenge my liberal friends to focus only on the facts.

Libya: Within 24 hours the White House was briefed by the intelligence department as to what happened in Libya. The administration knew that the American Ambassador was murdered by terrorists. Don't you find it odd that for over a week the administration blamed the event on a video and that the video created a spontaneous riot? Why would Secretary Clinton give a press briefing giving that as the reason? Why would the President of the United States speak in front of the United Nations and give this explanation? The White House Press Secretary for days spilled this as the reason?

But the truth of the matter appears to be lost in the administration. On the 11th anniversary of 9/11 would it not be common sense for the State Department to add additional security in a region where it is know to have terrorist cells? Weeks prior to the assassination, the State Department was warned that Ambassador Stevens was on a hit list. The terrorists had already had hit the compound with attacks prior to 9/11. Two days prior the Vice Presidential debate, the State Department spoke in front of Congress and told the committee that they requested additional security on two occasions only to be turned back. Not only turned back, but the State Department reduced their security.

So how can Vice President of the United State go out in front of the public and tell us in a debate that he did not know anything? He did not know they asked for help? It is not possible. The Vice President of the United States obtains a copy of the morning intelligence briefing like the President everyday. Also, an American Ambassador is assassinated and the story has hit all of the major news networks. Do they actually believe the American people are stupid not to believe they knew?

Here is the truth. The Obama Administration believe your stupid. There Middle East policy is going up in smoke because the American public will soon discover that leading from behind gets people killed. In fact, America is weaker and more at risk today than prior to Bush leaving office. The Administration wants you to believe that they have created alliances with other nations, but the truth of the matter, they foreign countries do not respect Obama.

An American Embassy and American Ambassador is assassinated and what does President Obama do? He flies to Las Vegas on a campaign stop. World leaders come to America to speak at the United Nations and the President can make time for Whoopee Goldberg, but can't meet with one Middle East leader? Then he gives a speech to the United Nations and talks about a video causing the assassination?

It is impossible to make this up. The President of the United States has met with the Brotherhood of Muslims, however he can not share dinner with America's biggest ally in the Middle East, Israel? All true. Iran is probably less than a year away from having nuclear weapons and he shuns the Israeli Prime Minister?

I was in college during the Reagan Administration and what ended the cold was Regan's view of peace thru strength. The communist block collapsed because they knew that the United States was the strongest military power on earth. President Clinton benefited from the Reagan policies which allowed America to expand and prosper. But one this Clinton did was shrink our military and reduced our intelligence gathering. The impact of that decision? 9/11/2001. What does Obama do with our military? He clearly demonstrates to our allies that we can not be counted on. He makes an apology tour of the Middle East that America was wrong. He calls the water boarding of key informants who led us to Osama Bin Laden as terrorists. And he def errs our foreign policy to the United Nations.

If your an American, you need to be angry. No country has given more to the world. If it were not for America. Germany would have won World War 2. America has a moral responsibility to lead the world if for no other reason, it is in our best interest. It is not the role of the President of United States to defer our national security issues to the United Nations. Do we really think Putin will support us? If Obama's apology tour was viewed as positive, then why is Egypt in chaos? Do you really think the Brotherhood of Muslims who number 1 mission is to kill the infidels going to support the United States? Has hope and change given us peace in Syria? If Iran was really afraid of us, why would they continue seeking the nuclear bomb?

Where do the facts take you? Is hope and change a good thing for America?

No comments:

Post a Comment